What's New in Apromore?

Read More

X

 

PhD theses

 

Master’s theses

 

Demonstration papers

 

Automated Discovery (Split Miner, Structured Miner, BPMN Miner)

 

Automated Discovery of Model Collections

 

Conformance Checking

 

Drift Mining

 

Logs/Streams Preprocessing

 

Models Configuration

 

Models Clone Detection

 

Models Merging

 

Models Querying

 

Models Repair

 

Models Similarity

  • R.M. Dijkman, M. Dumas, B. van Dongen; R. Käärik, and J. Mendling. Similarity of Business Process Models: Metrics and Evaluation. Information Systems 36(2), pp. 498-516, 2011.
  • M. Kunze and M. Weske. Metric Tree for Efficient Similairty Search in Large Process Model Repositories. 1st International Workshop “Process in the Large”, Hoboken, USA, 2010.
  • Z. Yan, R.M. Dijkman, P.W.P.J. Grefen. Fast Business Process Similarity Search with Feature-based Similarity Estimation. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS), Part I, Crete, Greece, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6426, Spinger, pp. 60-77, 2010.
  • M. Weidlich, R.M. Dijkman, and M. Weske. Deciding Behaviour Compatibility of Complex Correspondences between Process Models. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM), Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp. 78-94, 2010.
  • M. Weidlich, R.M. Dijkman, and J. Mendling. The ICoP Framework: Identification of Correspondences between Process Models. In: Proceedings of the 22th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), Hammamet, Tunesia, pp. 483-498, 2010.
  • M. Dumas, L. García-Bañuelos, and R.M. Dijkman. Similarity Search of Business Process Models. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering 32(3), pp. 23-28, 2009.
  • R.M. Dijkman, M. Dumas, and L. García-Bañuelos. Graph Matching Algorithms for Business Process Model Similarity Search. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM), Ulm, Germany, pp. 48-63, 2009.
  • R.M. Dijkman, M. Dumas, L. García-Bañuelos, and R. Käärik. Aligning Business Process Models. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE EDOC Conference (EDOC), Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 45-53, 2009.
  • R.M. Dijkman. Diagnosing Differences between Business Process Models. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM), Milan, Italy, pp. 261-277, 2008.
  • B.F. van Dongen, R.M. Dijkman, and J. Mendling. Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), Montpellier, France, pp. 450-464, 2008.
  • R.M. Dijkman. A Classification of Differences between Similar Business Processes. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE EDOC Conference (EDOC), Annapolis, MD, USA, pp. 37-47, 2007.

 

Models Understandability

  • H. Leopold, J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, M. La Rosa. Simplifying Process Model Abstraction: Techniques for Generating Process model NamesInformation Systems, Vol. 39, 2014.
  • M. Dumas, M. La Rosa, J. Mendling, R. Maesaku, H.A. Reijers, N. Semenenko. Understanding Business Process Models: The Costs and Benefits of Structuredness. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), Poland. LNCS Vol. 7328, pp. 31-46, Springer, 2012.
  • H.A. Reijers and J. Mendling. A Study into the Factors that Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 41(3), 449-462, 2011.
  • M. La Rosa, P. Wohed, J. Mendling, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, H. Reijers and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Managing Process Model Complexity via Abstract Syntax ModificationsIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 7 No. 4, 2011.
  • M. La Rosa, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, P. Wohed, H. Reijers, J. Mendling, W.M.P. van der Aalst, Managing Process Model Complexity via Concrete Syntax ModificationsIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 7 No. 2, 2011.
  • J. Mendling, J. Recker, and H.A. Reijers. On the Usage of Labels and Icons in Business Process Modeling. International Journal of Information Systems Modeling and Design, 1(2), 40-58, 2010.
  • J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, and J. Recker. Activity Labeling in Process Modeling: Empirical Insights and Recommendations. Information Systems, 35(4), 467-482, 2010.
  • J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Seven Process Modeling Guidelines (7PMG). Information and Software Technology, 52(2), 127-136, 2010.
  • H.A. Reijers, J. Recker, and S.G. van de Wouw. An Integrative Framework of the Factors Affecting Process Model Understanding: A Learning Perspective. In D. Leidner and J. Elameditors, Proceedings of the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2010). AIS Electronic Library, 2010.
  • M. Schrepfer, J. Wolf, J. Mendling, and H.A. Reijers. The Impact of Secondary Notation on Process Model Understanding. In A. Persson and J. Stirna, editors, Proceedings of 2nd IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on The Practice of Enterprise Modeling (PoEM 2010), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 39, 161-175. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2010
  • J. Melcher, J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, and D. Seese. On Measuring the Understandability of Process Models. In S. Rinderle-Ma, S. Sadiq, and F. Leymann, editors, Proceedings of the BPM workshops 2009, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 43, 465-476. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2010.
  • H.A. Reijers, R.S. Mans, and R.A. van der Toorn. Improved Model Management with Aggregated Business Process Models. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 68(2), 221-243, 2009.
  • H.A. Reijers, J. Mendling, and R.M. Dijkman. On the Usefulness of Subprocesses in Business Process Models. BPM Center Reports, BPM-10-03, 32 pages, 2010.
  • J. Mendling, J. Recker, and H.A. Reijers. Process Modeling Quality: A Framework and Research Agenda. BPM Center Reports, BPM-09-02, 18 pages, BPMcenter.org, 2009.
  • H.A. Reijers and J. Mendling. Modularity in Process Models: Review and Effects. In M. Dumas, M. Reichert and M.-C. Shan, editors, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Business Process Management (BPM 2008), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5240, 20-35. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2008.
  • J. Mendling and H.A. Reijers. How to Define Activity Labels for Business Process Models? In W. Hesse and A. Oberweis, editors, Proceedings of the 3rd AIS SIGSAND European Symposium on Analysis, Design, Use and Societal Impact of Information Systems, GI-Edition – Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) P-129, 117-127. Koellen-Verlag, 2008.
  • I. Vanderfeesten, H.A. Reijers, J. Mendling, W.M.P. van der Aalst, and J. Cardoso. On a Quest for Good Process Models: The Cross-Connectivity Metric. In Z. Bellahsène and M. Léonard, editors, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2008), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5074, 480-494. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2008.
  • J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, and Jorge Cardoso. What Makes Process Models Understandable? In G. Alonso, P. Dadam and M. Rosemann, editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference Business Process Management (BPM 2007), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4714, 48-63. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2007.
  • J. Cardoso, J. Mendling, G. Neumann, and H.A. Reijers. A Discourse on Complexity of Process Models. In J. Eder and S. Dustdar, editors, Proceedings of the BPM workshops 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4103, 117-128. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2006.

 

Online Automated Discovery

 

Performance Mining

 

Predictive Monitoring

 

Prescriptive Monitoring / Casual Process Mining

 

Robotic Process Mining

 

Stage-based Mining

 

Variant Analysis

 

Repository Technology